Site created 12/15/97.
page added: 3/15/99
talks Oliver Stone, NBK, and Common Sense
|I know he sort of
looks the part, but when did Oliver Stone become the next Jim Jones?
I doubt when he made the 1994 film Natural
Born Killers, his true purpose was to incite true crime
sprees by brain-fried wannabe killers aping Mickey (Woody Harrelson)
and Mallory (Juliette Lewis).
For those not in the know, this last Monday (3/8/99), our own
United States Supreme Court declined to rule on a suit filed against
Oliver Stone and Time-Warner (see
news story). This makes the case worthy of litigation by
overturning a lower court's decision to throw the case out, and
letting Louisiana's First Circuit Court Of Appeals try the case. The
case focuses on the apparent 1995 shooting a Louisiana convenience
store clerk by a couple of yahoos who thought they were the next
coming of M&M. The store clerk was a woman by the name of Patsy
Byers, and although she survived the shooting, finding herself
delved into a living nightmare as a quadriplegic -- she died a short
time later from cancer.
The shooters were Sarah Edmondson and Benjamin Darrus (both 18 at
the time) -- they were convicted and sentenced for 35 years in
prison. They both claimed to have watched the Stone directed film
Natural Born Killers, not
once, not twice, but more than a whopping 20 times -- on video, of
all things. They were probably pissed it wasn't on DVD to help them
watch it more times quicker -- it's a bitch rewinding it every time,
isn't it guys?
I'm not trying to lessen this horrible crime. What I am doing, is
wondering what the hell is going on with this world? First off, why
are people dying for senseless reasons --like two punk-ass kids
running around with guns, thinking it's cool to shoot people 'cause
it looks cool on TV? Secondly, why are storytellers being held
responsible for their art affecting other people's lives? And
lastly, how do cases like this affect the chances for the movies in
question to be released in the future, for example, on DVD?
As for my first question, I'm going to leave the answer up to those
of you reading this. My opinion is: there are some stupid people out
there. They'd have to be to do some of the things I see going on. I
find it sickening that some people don't have anything better to do
with their lives than replicate what they see in movies and TV --
and not think about any sort of outcome. Guns don't kill people,
stupid asses with guns kill people. The second point, I think (and
hope) will be cleared up rather quickly, although I'm scared as an
artist, what the long term effect is going to be.
It seems that in March of 1996, Ms. Byers' relatives filed the
original suit in a Louisiana court against Oliver Stone and the
producing studio, Warner Bros (actually the corporate company,
Time-Warner). This happens many times, really. The Supreme Court
refuses to hear cases all the time, and we shouldn't construe the
case has merit just because of this. Joe Simpson, the family's
attorney believes that his lawsuit is fortified by a statement Stone
made during an interview, where he said, "The most pacifistic
people in the world said they came out of this movie and wanted to
kill somebody." Simpson claims that, by saying this, Stone
outright claims that his point was to actually incite people to
murder. I love attorneys. They can find their own meaning in
everything, can't they?
What I get from the Stone quote, is that Stone was remarking on how
the film made people feel -- even the nicest person was effected. I
don't get that he was happy that people felt that way. I see NBK
as a anti-violence statement more than anything else. I personally
know more people turned off by violent films after watching that
movie -- some even refuse to watch any movies that are violent at
all now. I found myself wanting to kill after watching The
Thin Red Line (actually, I just wanted to kill Terrence
Malick, but nonetheless, I wanted to kill). But I wouldn't do such a
thing, because I have a brain in my head, and know that it's wrong
The bright spot in all of this, is that Simpson and his team of
lawyers have to prove to a jury that Stone made the film to incite
violence. An if this guy does that, I'm putting him on my speed dial
-- I shit you not. Then again, it's that "We The People"
thing that bothers me. Like I said above, it's in the hands of a
jury -- a group of average people (who, as I pointed out are
probably stupid -- but I hope to Kubrick they're not). You get the
right (or wrong) mix, and this is a huge blow to not only Stone et
al, but for the First Amendment and people like you and me. "I
think that Hollywood ought to be very concerned," said Los
Angeles lawyer Douglas Mirell in the Los
Angeles Times recently, regarding this case. "There
is no way of knowing what a jury would do if this case goes to
trial." I know I'm concerned.
Let's hear what you think. We, here at the Bits,
would like to know what your concerns are on this, because it not
only effects the First Amendment, it effects your life, your viewing
habits and the Internet. I've also got a call in at Pioneer, to see
what they think -- if this effects the chances of NBK
hitting DVD any time soon. I'll let you know what happens when I
Until then, keep spinning those discs...
Editor's Note: Write Doogan at
if you have any ideas for future inside looks, interviews, or you
just want to find out how great / crappy a DVD is. He'll write ya
back, and if he doesn't -- he's probably dead.